Skip to main content

About the skepticism and the meeting between Kim Jong Un and Donald Trump

Picture I

http://kimmontaidearvioita.blogspot.com/p/about-skepticism-and-meeting-between.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Skepticism is always the good thing, but also optimism is important when we are talking about the meetings like North Korean and the United States leaders. The major part of the philosophy of defense is that nations should believe in the peace, but prepare for war. This is the thing with the relationships between those two states, what have nuclear power behind their leaders. When we are thinking about positivism and the normalizing the relationships between nations, we must say that positivism would tempt the North Korean government start to make changes in their country, and in this situation, the best way to act is to encourage this advantage.


But also there is also very many contracts in history, what the North Korean leaders have put their names in the papers, and then they have broken those promises. The most well-known case about that kind of politics has been re-beginning of the nuclear program of that nation. This program was given results, what we all know. And in the real world, there is many frighten weapons of mass destruction than some nuclear weapons can ever be.
Ranges of North Korea's missiles
Picture II


The biological weapons are more deadly than nuclear weapons, and North Korea has probably those organisms in their laboratories. The delivering of the organisms like Ebola is easier than launching nuclear weapons. The structure of delivering system would be lighter, and then delivering that kind of organisms can be made by dropping the test tubes from satellites. This is one of the worst nightmares in the world.


If North Korea would break the contract, and deny the meetings, we must face the similar problems than before. And the North Korean leaders would be stronger than ever before because they can use nuclear weapons in the shield of internal politics. There are rumors, that there is hiding nuclear weapons in the Pyongyang, what is ready to explode if the leaders of that country are in danger. But when we are talking about the nuclear weapons of the United States arsenal, we must also face the truth, that this nation has more threats than North Korea, and if it would start to disarming its systems, must the Russia and China also cutting their strike capacity.


And they would not go in that process, because those nations feel that India, Pakistan, Great Britain and France are also the threat to those nations, and there would be more nations in the nuclear club,because the membership in this group of the nation guarantees the respective handling of those nations in the international areas. And that's why many nations want those weapons for protecting their interests in the global environment.

Picture I

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/ct-0YyoSOsU/maxresdefault.jpg

Picture II

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DCDEHZjXoAAERzk.jpg

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

MIT's tractor beam can make the new types of SASER systems possible

   "This chip-based "tractor-beam," which uses an intensely focused beam of light to capture and manipulate biological particles without damaging the cells, could help biologists study the mechanisms of diseases."(Interesting Engineering, MIT’s Star Wars-inspired ‘tractor beam’ uses light to capture, manipulate cells) MIT's tractor beam can make the new types of SASER systems possible. The tractor beam just hovers the nanoparticle in air or medium, and then the laser or some other electromagnetic system transports oscillation into those particles. The ability to make cells and other particles hover in the system makes it possible to create particles whose energy level or resonance frequencies are accurately calculated things.  That thing makes it possible to create things that transmit wave movement accurately and cleanly. This is one version of the use of a tractor beam. Modern tractor beams are like acoustic tweezers where sound waves lock the object in its cr

The new observations tell that the thunderstorms form gamma-rays. That could make gamma-ray lasers possible.

  "An illustration of NASA’s research plane ER-2 flying over thunderstorms. Credit: University of Bergen / Mount Visual (CC BY 4.0), edited" (ScitechDaily, Surprising Discovery: NASA’s Retrofitted U2 Spy Plane Reveals Tropical Lightning Storms Are Radioactive) The new observations tell that the thunderstorms form gamma-rays. That could make gamma-ray lasers possible. The process has been observed by the NASA (Lockheed) ER-2 research plane, which is a modified U-2 spy plane. The gamma-ray formation in thunderstorms. Where lightning and electric fields release electrons that impact the air molecules and water droplets is an interesting thing. That thing opens the route to solving many mysteries.  "The general physics behind how thunderstorms create high-energy flashes of gamma radiation is not a mystery. As thunderstorms develop, swirling drafts drive water droplets, hail, and ice into a mixture that creates an electric charge much like rubbing a balloon on your shirt. Pos

Chinese innovations and space lasers are interesting combinations.

Above: "Tiangong is China's operational space station located in low Earth orbit. (Image credit: Alejomiranda via Getty Images)" (Scpace.com, China's space station, Tiangong: A complete guide) Chinese are close to making nuclear-powered spacecraft.  Almost every day, we can read about Chinese technical advances. So are, the Chinese more innovative than Western people? Or is there some kind of difference in culture and morale between Western and Chinese societies? The Chinese superiority in hypersonic technology is one of the things that tells something about the Chinese way of making things.  In China, the mission means. And the only thing that means is mission. That means that things like budgets and safety orders are far different from Western standards. If some project serves the Chinese communist party and PLA (People's Liberation Army) that guarantees unlimited resources for those projects. Chinese authorities must not care about the public opinion.  If we th