Skip to main content

The artificial amoeba could be the real-life version of T-1000 robot.

Picture I
http://kimmontaidearvioita.blogspot.com/p/the-artificial-amoeba-could-be-real.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

There are many juridical and ethical problems with nanotechnology, and one of them is connecting to the artificial amoebas or the liquid robots, what can change their form. Nanotechnology is one of the most complicated things in the world, and here I'm writing about molecular nanotechnology, what is very easy to weaponize. This technology is, of course, meant for peaceful purposes, like giving the cure for cancer, but the same systems can be used as weapons. One of the most elegant ways to make nanomachines is using the oil, and the molecules of that thing would be connected with the iron atom.


That atom allows controlling those oil molecules by using the magnetic field, and that material can be used for making the artificial amoeba. That amoeba would be in the future the real-life version of T-1000 robot from the Terminator movies. That mass would be controlled by small size microchips, what would transform the shape of this mass by magnets. And that liquid robot can move like the amoeba.


Those small size microchips can be equipped with detectors, what allows it to track the persons or chemicals in some area. And when the target would be allowed to eliminate, this liquid machine just slip in the body by the sweat gland. After that this machine would just close the blood vessel in the targeted person brains. There are many legal problems with that technology, and one of them is, should this kind of machine classified as the chemical weapon, or should the international community make some kind of contract about this kind of technology?


When we are thinking about this kind of liquid robot, we might also ask one question: would it use against the opponent's leader in the situation where the use of the weapons of the mass destruction would be possible? Those liquid robots can slip into the water system, and then they could find their target and eliminate that person. Those machines can also slip in the computers, and cause the short circuits in the microcircuits. They might be equipped with extremely small size rechargeable batteries and those microchips could work as the network, what would make those robots independently. Those batteries could be loaded by using similar wireless chargers that are used with mobile telephones. In this scenario, the drones could carry those chargers and give electricity to that machine.

Picture I



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Chinese innovations and space lasers are interesting combinations.

Above: "Tiangong is China's operational space station located in low Earth orbit. (Image credit: Alejomiranda via Getty Images)" (Scpace.com, China's space station, Tiangong: A complete guide) Chinese are close to making nuclear-powered spacecraft.  Almost every day, we can read about Chinese technical advances. So are, the Chinese more innovative than Western people? Or is there some kind of difference in culture and morale between Western and Chinese societies? The Chinese superiority in hypersonic technology is one of the things that tells something about the Chinese way of making things.  In China, the mission means. And the only thing that means is mission. That means that things like budgets and safety orders are far different from Western standards. If some project serves the Chinese communist party and PLA (People's Liberation Army) that guarantees unlimited resources for those projects. Chinese authorities must not care about the public opinion.  If we th

Iron Dome is one of the most effective air defense systems.

The Iron Dome is a missile defense system whose missiles operate with highly sophisticated and effective artificial intelligence. The power of this missile defense base is in selective fire. The system calculates the incoming missile's trajectory. And it shoots only missiles that will hit the inhabited area. The system saves missiles and focuses defense on areas that mean something. The system shares the incoming missiles in, maybe two groups. Another is harmless and another is harmful.  Things like killer drones are also problematic because their trajectories are harder to calculate than ballistic missiles. The thing that makes drones dangerous is that they can make masks for ballistic missiles. And even if those drones are slow, all of them must be shot down.  The thing is that the cooperation between drone swarms and ballistic missiles is the next danger in conflict areas. In the film, you can see how drones make light images of the skies. The killer drones can also carry LED li

The innovative shield that protects OSIRIS-APEX can also protect the new hypersonic aircraft.

"NASA’s OSIRIS-APEX spacecraft successfully completed its closest solar pass, protected by innovative engineering solutions and showing improvements in onboard instruments. Credit: NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center/CI Lab" (ScitechDaily, Innovative Engineering Shields NASA’s OSIRIS-APEX During Close Encounter With the Sun) The OSIRIS-APEX probe travels close to the sun. The mission plan is to research the sun. And especially find things that can warn about solar storms. Solar storms are things that can danger satellites at the Earth orbiter. And the purpose of OSIRIS-APEX is to find the method of how to predict those solar storms. Another thing is that the OSIRIS-APEX tests the systems and materials that protect this probe against heat and plasma impacts.  The same technology. The researchers created for OSIRIS-APEX can used in the materials and structures. That protects satellites against nuclear explosions. That means this kind of system delivers information on how to prot