About the moderation and sharing information

http://kimmontaidearvioita.blogspot.com/p/about-moderation-and-sharing-information.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

In Finland is starting the trial against the creator of MV-lehti Ilya Janitskin, what is later called as the MV-magazine, and another one person docent Jouni Bäckman, about the writings what have been written about one journalist. And this means that this trial is very important because there is searched limits about the writings in the magazines and media.

When we are thinking about the role of the creator of the MV-magazine, we are looking for the answer to the question, did that man only forget to moderate that net magazine, or did he have the more active role in this case? The MV-magazine (MV-lehti) have another line than the main media have, and it is mentioned to delivering the neo-nazi propaganda, and the publish have been mentioned to work under the protection or even under the control of Kremlin and the Russian military authorities.

That magazine has kept the very nationalistically focused line, and if we are thinking the role of the Kremlin in this project, the nationalism is supporting the Kremlin interests in Europe. The Kremlin interest is to break the NATO and European Union by using very large scale information campaigns, where is supporting nationalism, and every time when that kind of campaigns are going on, the question for the nations would be "why your soldiers must risk their lives for some other nation? And also the goodwill of the Kremlin is also highlighted. When we are thinking about this thing, we must ask one question: did that man, who created this web magazine knew about this? And what have been the purpose of those writings?

Are they meant for closing the social media, or are they controlled by Kremlin? Or is this true at all? Is the purpose of that type of articles only show, how much support the neo-nazis have in this country? That means, there would be not any connections between Kremlin and MV-magazine. If there would be no connection, that would be one version of those conspiracy theories, what must be placed in garbage tray.

Sometimes I wonder, how much connections is between some skinheads and Kremlin intelligence? In MV-magazine have been the articles, where the writers, what could be classified as the supporters of the skinheads are mentioned, that they have "good connections for Finnish police" and introduced the policemen as the members of their organizations. Also in some main media texts, what have made the journalists, who are working in those magazines, have published the "hate writings", where is seen very strong "right-wing nationalist attitudes".

At the same time in some cases, the journalists have claimed, that skinheads would have support from the Russian military. That would seem the very interesting combination, that the persons, who think that Russia is the greatest threat for the culture, claims that they get support from the leaders of Russia. But let's get back to that trial. The main question is, have somebody stole those homepages, and should Janitskin moderate that thing more intensive? And if that thing grows bigger than he thought, why he didn't shut it down?

Another question is, where that man gets the money for living? Who pays his salary? And is the payer some kind of covert firm, what have the connections for Gazprom, what can be used as the covert company, and the salary payer, that the security service of Kremlin would not be uncovered. But this might result in only the paranoid imagination, and those persons would act alone in this case, what brings MV-magazine to public arenas, and the trial is very important because if those persons would be found guilty, the magazine might be blocked from the Internet because of those hate writings.

https://www.mtv.fi/uutiset/rikos/artikkeli/mv-lehden-perustaja-ilja-janitskinin-pidetaan-edelleen-vangittuna-syytetaan-useista-rikoksista/6948416

https://www.mtv.fi/uutiset/rikos/artikkeli/solvaavaa-ja-panettelevaa-vihapuhetta-mv-julkaisun-perustaja-ilja-janitskin-kiistaa-vastanneensa-julkaisun-sisallosta/6947768

https://www.mtv.fi/uutiset/rikos/artikkeli/asianajaja-ylen-toimittaja-ei-uskalla-kavella-kadulla-suomessa-hanen-elamansa-on-tuhottu/6948194#gs.pDJdoRU

https://www.mtv.fi/uutiset/rikos/artikkeli/syyttaja-vaatii-janitskinille-ja-backmanille-vankeusrangaistuksia/6947786

Chinese innovations and space lasers are interesting combinations.

Above: "Tiangong is China's operational space station located in low Earth orbit. (Image credit: Alejomiranda via Getty Images)" (Scpace.com, China's space station, Tiangong: A complete guide) Chinese are close to making nuclear-powered spacecraft. Almost every day, we can read about Chinese technical advances. So are, the Chinese more innovative than Western people? Or is there some kind of difference in culture and morale between Western and Chinese societies? The Chinese superiority in hypersonic technology is one of the things that tells something about the Chinese way of making things. In China, the mission means. And the only thing that means is mission. That means that things like budgets and safety orders are far different from Western standards. If some project serves the Chinese communist party and PLA (People's Liberation Army) that guarantees unlimited resources for those projects. Chinese authorities must not care about the public opinion. If we th

Iron Dome is one of the most effective air defense systems.

The Iron Dome is a missile defense system whose missiles operate with highly sophisticated and effective artificial intelligence. The power of this missile defense base is in selective fire. The system calculates the incoming missile's trajectory. And it shoots only missiles that will hit the inhabited area. The system saves missiles and focuses defense on areas that mean something. The system shares the incoming missiles in, maybe two groups. Another is harmless and another is harmful. Things like killer drones are also problematic because their trajectories are harder to calculate than ballistic missiles. The thing that makes drones dangerous is that they can make masks for ballistic missiles. And even if those drones are slow, all of them must be shot down. The thing is that the cooperation between drone swarms and ballistic missiles is the next danger in conflict areas. In the film, you can see how drones make light images of the skies. The killer drones can also carry LED li

The innovative shield that protects OSIRIS-APEX can also protect the new hypersonic aircraft.

"NASA’s OSIRIS-APEX spacecraft successfully completed its closest solar pass, protected by innovative engineering solutions and showing improvements in onboard instruments. Credit: NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center/CI Lab" (ScitechDaily, Innovative Engineering Shields NASA’s OSIRIS-APEX During Close Encounter With the Sun) The OSIRIS-APEX probe travels close to the sun. The mission plan is to research the sun. And especially find things that can warn about solar storms. Solar storms are things that can danger satellites at the Earth orbiter. And the purpose of OSIRIS-APEX is to find the method of how to predict those solar storms. Another thing is that the OSIRIS-APEX tests the systems and materials that protect this probe against heat and plasma impacts. The same technology. The researchers created for OSIRIS-APEX can used in the materials and structures. That protects satellites against nuclear explosions. That means this kind of system delivers information on how to prot

Interesting and futuristic innovations

Search This Blog