Skip to main content

Majorana particle and superposition.

Could the particle itself be its antiparticle? Could that particle have those positions at the same time? Italian physicist Ettore Majorana (1906-possible after 1959) believed that is possible. At least he believed that some particles can turn spontaneously its an antiparticle. We know one group of fermions, Dirac fermions, that have different antiparticles. But there is no clear evidence about the existence of Majorana particles or Majorana fermions. In this text term, Majorana-particle means the same as Majorana fermion. 

The reaction that makes a hypothetical Majorana particle interesting is that it can change its spin depending does it face antiparticles or particles. So that kind of particle that spin changes very easily, could have no annihilation. The particle- or antiparticle that comes near that particle can change its spin before annihilation is possible. Annihilation requires that the particle interacts with its mirror particle. And if the spin changes that means there is no annihilation.  

Majorana-particle is the particle that is its antiparticle. But it's theoretically possible that the Majorana particle could be at the same time its antiparticle and particle-pair. There is the possibility that the internal superposition of the particle makes this thing possible.

But even if Majorana particles can "only" spontaneously switch their form from anti-particle to particle and oppositely that could be the most fundamental thing in physics. The internal superposition allows researchers to make protected qubits. If particles can have internal superpositions that are making them into their antiparticles. That thing could be a revolution in quantum computing. 

But also, if Majorana particles are separated. And they can change their form from particle to antiparticle and oppositely.  That makes it possible to transport information between two qubits. The first qubit was made of particle-pair. And the second is made by using anti-particle pairs. 


Ettore Majorana (1906- possibly after 1959) 

Could there be a particle that has particle- and antiparticle states at the same time? 


The superposition is the thing, that makes the quantum computer operate. Theoretically, one single particle can form a quantum computer if that particle has multiple internal superpositions. That means superposition is not necessary between particles. It might be the internal structure of a particle. 

This is the reason why researchers are interested in Majorana particles. Those hypothetical particles are themselves their antiparticles. That thing gives possible to create new and powerful quantum computers. The particles like electrons have Majorana-ability. They can change their form to their antiparticles when they travel through the thin gold layer. But spontaneously happening Majorana particles are not seen. 

The thing that makes Majorana particle possible is the whisk-looking structure of elementary particles. In that model, the superstrings can change the direction of their spin. And that means the Majorana particle can turn into its antiparticle. Or is the thing so simple? Did Ettore Majorana mean that a particle can turn to its antiparticle? 

Or did he mean that particles can be anti-particles and particles at the same time? Could that thing be possible? If superstrings are forming the particle shell. There is the possibility that the particle can be at the same time as its antiparticle. We can call this hypothetical particle a black-and-white particle. But if something forms this thing. Could the internal structure of that particle cause internal annihilation? Or could that particle be stable? 


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ettore_Majorana


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Majorana_fermion

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

MIT's tractor beam can make the new types of SASER systems possible

   "This chip-based "tractor-beam," which uses an intensely focused beam of light to capture and manipulate biological particles without damaging the cells, could help biologists study the mechanisms of diseases."(Interesting Engineering, MIT’s Star Wars-inspired ‘tractor beam’ uses light to capture, manipulate cells) MIT's tractor beam can make the new types of SASER systems possible. The tractor beam just hovers the nanoparticle in air or medium, and then the laser or some other electromagnetic system transports oscillation into those particles. The ability to make cells and other particles hover in the system makes it possible to create particles whose energy level or resonance frequencies are accurately calculated things.  That thing makes it possible to create things that transmit wave movement accurately and cleanly. This is one version of the use of a tractor beam. Modern tractor beams are like acoustic tweezers where sound waves lock the object in its cr

The new observations tell that the thunderstorms form gamma-rays. That could make gamma-ray lasers possible.

  "An illustration of NASA’s research plane ER-2 flying over thunderstorms. Credit: University of Bergen / Mount Visual (CC BY 4.0), edited" (ScitechDaily, Surprising Discovery: NASA’s Retrofitted U2 Spy Plane Reveals Tropical Lightning Storms Are Radioactive) The new observations tell that the thunderstorms form gamma-rays. That could make gamma-ray lasers possible. The process has been observed by the NASA (Lockheed) ER-2 research plane, which is a modified U-2 spy plane. The gamma-ray formation in thunderstorms. Where lightning and electric fields release electrons that impact the air molecules and water droplets is an interesting thing. That thing opens the route to solving many mysteries.  "The general physics behind how thunderstorms create high-energy flashes of gamma radiation is not a mystery. As thunderstorms develop, swirling drafts drive water droplets, hail, and ice into a mixture that creates an electric charge much like rubbing a balloon on your shirt. Pos

Chinese innovations and space lasers are interesting combinations.

Above: "Tiangong is China's operational space station located in low Earth orbit. (Image credit: Alejomiranda via Getty Images)" (Scpace.com, China's space station, Tiangong: A complete guide) Chinese are close to making nuclear-powered spacecraft.  Almost every day, we can read about Chinese technical advances. So are, the Chinese more innovative than Western people? Or is there some kind of difference in culture and morale between Western and Chinese societies? The Chinese superiority in hypersonic technology is one of the things that tells something about the Chinese way of making things.  In China, the mission means. And the only thing that means is mission. That means that things like budgets and safety orders are far different from Western standards. If some project serves the Chinese communist party and PLA (People's Liberation Army) that guarantees unlimited resources for those projects. Chinese authorities must not care about the public opinion.  If we th