Skip to main content

Majorana particle and superposition.

Could the particle itself be its antiparticle? Could that particle have those positions at the same time? Italian physicist Ettore Majorana (1906-possible after 1959) believed that is possible. At least he believed that some particles can turn spontaneously its an antiparticle. We know one group of fermions, Dirac fermions, that have different antiparticles. But there is no clear evidence about the existence of Majorana particles or Majorana fermions. In this text term, Majorana-particle means the same as Majorana fermion. 

The reaction that makes a hypothetical Majorana particle interesting is that it can change its spin depending does it face antiparticles or particles. So that kind of particle that spin changes very easily, could have no annihilation. The particle- or antiparticle that comes near that particle can change its spin before annihilation is possible. Annihilation requires that the particle interacts with its mirror particle. And if the spin changes that means there is no annihilation.  

Majorana-particle is the particle that is its antiparticle. But it's theoretically possible that the Majorana particle could be at the same time its antiparticle and particle-pair. There is the possibility that the internal superposition of the particle makes this thing possible.

But even if Majorana particles can "only" spontaneously switch their form from anti-particle to particle and oppositely that could be the most fundamental thing in physics. The internal superposition allows researchers to make protected qubits. If particles can have internal superpositions that are making them into their antiparticles. That thing could be a revolution in quantum computing. 

But also, if Majorana particles are separated. And they can change their form from particle to antiparticle and oppositely.  That makes it possible to transport information between two qubits. The first qubit was made of particle-pair. And the second is made by using anti-particle pairs. 


Ettore Majorana (1906- possibly after 1959) 

Could there be a particle that has particle- and antiparticle states at the same time? 


The superposition is the thing, that makes the quantum computer operate. Theoretically, one single particle can form a quantum computer if that particle has multiple internal superpositions. That means superposition is not necessary between particles. It might be the internal structure of a particle. 

This is the reason why researchers are interested in Majorana particles. Those hypothetical particles are themselves their antiparticles. That thing gives possible to create new and powerful quantum computers. The particles like electrons have Majorana-ability. They can change their form to their antiparticles when they travel through the thin gold layer. But spontaneously happening Majorana particles are not seen. 

The thing that makes Majorana particle possible is the whisk-looking structure of elementary particles. In that model, the superstrings can change the direction of their spin. And that means the Majorana particle can turn into its antiparticle. Or is the thing so simple? Did Ettore Majorana mean that a particle can turn to its antiparticle? 

Or did he mean that particles can be anti-particles and particles at the same time? Could that thing be possible? If superstrings are forming the particle shell. There is the possibility that the particle can be at the same time as its antiparticle. We can call this hypothetical particle a black-and-white particle. But if something forms this thing. Could the internal structure of that particle cause internal annihilation? Or could that particle be stable? 


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ettore_Majorana


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Majorana_fermion

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Chinese innovations and space lasers are interesting combinations.

Above: "Tiangong is China's operational space station located in low Earth orbit. (Image credit: Alejomiranda via Getty Images)" (Scpace.com, China's space station, Tiangong: A complete guide) Chinese are close to making nuclear-powered spacecraft.  Almost every day, we can read about Chinese technical advances. So are, the Chinese more innovative than Western people? Or is there some kind of difference in culture and morale between Western and Chinese societies? The Chinese superiority in hypersonic technology is one of the things that tells something about the Chinese way of making things.  In China, the mission means. And the only thing that means is mission. That means that things like budgets and safety orders are far different from Western standards. If some project serves the Chinese communist party and PLA (People's Liberation Army) that guarantees unlimited resources for those projects. Chinese authorities must not care about the public opinion.  If we th

Iron Dome is one of the most effective air defense systems.

The Iron Dome is a missile defense system whose missiles operate with highly sophisticated and effective artificial intelligence. The power of this missile defense base is in selective fire. The system calculates the incoming missile's trajectory. And it shoots only missiles that will hit the inhabited area. The system saves missiles and focuses defense on areas that mean something. The system shares the incoming missiles in, maybe two groups. Another is harmless and another is harmful.  Things like killer drones are also problematic because their trajectories are harder to calculate than ballistic missiles. The thing that makes drones dangerous is that they can make masks for ballistic missiles. And even if those drones are slow, all of them must be shot down.  The thing is that the cooperation between drone swarms and ballistic missiles is the next danger in conflict areas. In the film, you can see how drones make light images of the skies. The killer drones can also carry LED li

The innovative shield that protects OSIRIS-APEX can also protect the new hypersonic aircraft.

"NASA’s OSIRIS-APEX spacecraft successfully completed its closest solar pass, protected by innovative engineering solutions and showing improvements in onboard instruments. Credit: NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center/CI Lab" (ScitechDaily, Innovative Engineering Shields NASA’s OSIRIS-APEX During Close Encounter With the Sun) The OSIRIS-APEX probe travels close to the sun. The mission plan is to research the sun. And especially find things that can warn about solar storms. Solar storms are things that can danger satellites at the Earth orbiter. And the purpose of OSIRIS-APEX is to find the method of how to predict those solar storms. Another thing is that the OSIRIS-APEX tests the systems and materials that protect this probe against heat and plasma impacts.  The same technology. The researchers created for OSIRIS-APEX can used in the materials and structures. That protects satellites against nuclear explosions. That means this kind of system delivers information on how to prot