Nuclear weapons are the really good tool in international politics

(Picture 1)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Nuclear weapons are the most calculated systems in the world. The strike capacity of those weapons is planned by men, who are got Nobel prizes for their scientific honors. And the person who operates those systems is selected the most intelligent process what military systems can ever create. The nuclear weapon is extremely expensive, and the most secure military equipment what mankind ever created. And they are the very good tool to make other nations to listen the owner of those weapons own ideas. If the nation has nuclear weapons, it's very easy to choose diplomatic solutions, if that nation makes something, what is normally prohibited in an international field. This is the reason, why superpowers have this kind of armament.

The new weapons of Russia are really fascinating. They would be very devastating, and some persons have asked, why the western world didn’t do this kind of weapons. The problem of Russian weapon systems is that they are so monstrous. And somebody asked once the good question, can Russian or the Soviet government do anything small. The world’s most devastating nuclear device 50 mt. the weapon can also installed to head of “Sarmat” missile, and there might be also airplanes, where that weapon is internally installed.


Those superweapons have one little problem. Their destruction range is so huge, that they can only use against Washington. If those weapons are used on the battlefield, all troops would be erased in seconds. Another way to use those weapons effectively is just detonated them under the Atlantic or Pacific surface. The underwater explosions would destroy any submarine on the ocean, but the own submarines must be warned about this kind of attack, that they could avoid the pressure wave.


When we are thinking the U.S NAVY’s situation in the South China Sea, we must say that the admirals of the fleet must know the weaknesses about those naval units. And somehow I must say that maybe those ships are decoys for some other actions. The nuclear arsenals of the United States and Russia are basically same. There are two types of weapons, what supports together. The strategic weapons are long-range missiles, what might have many types of warheads. The mobile systems survivability bases, that they are hard to locate before shooting. Fixed systems are easy to locate and they are installed in hardened silos, and their survivability bases the bunker-type solutions. Those systems can be destroyed by seismic warheads, what is penetrating in the ground before the explosion.


Fixed systems are needed for the train the missile troops because this way the political trust of personnel can be diagnosed. And “no wanted” persons like drug users and unstable personnel can cut off the system. The use of those systems as training is safer because the silo-based missiles are harder to steal than highly mobile systems. The ICBM needs two points to flight: the beginning point of flight and target point. And that’s why silo-based ICBM can launch the little bit faster than mobile systems but the time is only marginal. Satellite navigation makes the targeting the systems very fast, and the difference between those systems reaction times is the only couple of seconds.


There is one very big problem by choosing those warheads. Smaller warheads are lighter than big ones, and they can carry more in the head of the missile. Those warheads can be used against any target, what they would need to destroy. The smaller size means that they are harder to destroy than larger. But there is one problem with small warheads. They must hit precisely on target. The bigger warheads are not carried so many in same time, but they would destroy larger areas in same time. If somebody steals those warheads,  the result would be devastating. There is always the possibility of terrorist action against those missiles because those weapons are so wanted thing in the mind of fanatics.  And the problem with the selection of warheads is if the state has the only couple of large yield nuclear warheads, they can destroy easily if they would be located in space or by recon planes. But if those missiles were launched, the ability to destroy them is very low.


Mobile nuclear weapons are extremely hard to locate. But if the weapon is located it’s easy to destroy. All missile systems need fixed bases for security and service duties of those weapons. Also, ICBM’s are assembled in mobile platforms, and submarine-based ballistic missiles are “hard to find, easy to kill” weapons. Tactical nuclear weapons are supporting strategic weapons by destroying enemy troops or aircraft what attacks the missile site. And those weapons are used as “police armament” if the commanders of strategic nuclear weapons are rebellious. There is actually no direct line between tactical or strategic nuclear weapons, and long-range strategic systems can also use to support the situation on the battlefields around the world. One thing what we must notice is that the USA or other western nation would say any world against “Sarmat” missile. So we must say that no nation would uncover their best weapons.

Sources:

Picture 1

http://newstodaypk.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/nuclear-bomb-explosion.jpg

How to make a machine, what reacts for feelings? And what makes them dangerous for national security?

(Picture 1)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Have you seen the movie "Terminator"? There is a scene, where robot answers "Fuck you asshole" for the knocker. This is the thing what makes it feel so human. And that gives this fictional robot the capacity to slip into the resistance and eliminate the wanted persons. This is the horrific vision of future, where artificial intelligence has killed the human race and starts to war against humans.

Robots are creating to replace humans in boring jobs, where are problems to find workers, because of bad salary. Most elegant way to make robots, is to make them so sensitive, that they can play feelings, and that would make them very good workers in hospitals. Those sensitive robots would use their sensors to monitor how opponent speaks, does the opponent turn red, or what kind of voice this opponent has. This kind of robots are creating in Japan, and their missions would be customer service in restaurants and hospitals. Also, sex-industry might be interested in those machines.


By analyzing those changes, would that robot or computer notice if the opponent is angry, sad or glad. Also, they would notice if the person enjoys some food or seem nervous. Sensors would notice if there are tears in the opponent's eyes, and in that cases, it would show empathy for that person. Those robots would be so humane, that there would be hard to separate them from a real human.


Those robots are equipped with computer programs, what notices the changes of voice, or other marks of the person’s behavior. Also, those robots might have infrared sensors, what notices the changes in the skin temperature. And those sensors would notice if the person moves arms little bit too fast. That would tell robot if the person is stressed. After that, the computer chooses right protocol how to start talking with the person.


Closed space like hospital or school is the very good working area of those robots because they could be connected to WLAN all the time, and when they would need more computer power, they can take assistance from some central computers, what helps them to solve problems. In those robots are also some risks, what might ever think before. If those robots would be used in some police or intelligence missions, they might be easy to handle, and those machines can slip in the enemy leaders close circle.


Those robots can be assisted by some aircraft like E-6 Mercury, what can give their calculating capacity for those machines. That human like robots can use in surveillance missions, but there is one great danger for those systems. If somebody would use them as the eliminators or assassins, nothing would stop them. Of course, there would be effective weapons like computer viruses, what would be harmless for humans, but they would destroy robots. And they could be an effective defense against those machines.


But the problem of those robots is that they might have “ghost protocol”. This means that they can do their missions on two levels. Those robots can work as bodyguards, but they can also use for illegal activities. That kind of robots can work in their normal duties all the time, but when they notice the targeted person, those machines would eliminate this man or woman, and then they would return their normal duties. And the memories of those robots can be erased.


Those robots could be slip near the key persons of the military, and if they will start the operation, could those androids just kill them. Or some private corporation would use them to eliminate their competitors. So the Mafia of tomorrow would use this kind of devices as killers. But they can also use in the military missions around the world, and that would allow hiding even great scale of war.

Sources:

Terminator "Fuck you asshole" scene

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zlJtohZSsfY


Picture 1

http://themalestrom.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/RobotsvHuman-750x450.jpg

Cheap WIG (Wing In Ground) aircraft and the capacity of that technology

(Picture 1)

https://www.instagram.com/p/Bfyc-3NFctG/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The new era of aviation is so-called cheap aircraft, what can be equipped with same engines as cars, and what are easy to control. Above the text is a link to the video, of EKRANOPLAN of WIG (Wing In Ground) vehicle, what uses hybrid-motors. Those engines are actually electric motors, what is connected to a generator and car motor. That system gives this kind of aircraft capacity to use normal petroleum as fuel.


WIG-technology means that under the airplane is made the air cushion, and the airplane is laying on it. The system is actually quite easy to make, and it needs only the flaps what makes dam under the wing of the plane. This flap turns down, and it can give airplane the capacity to flight very low altitude with very high speed.

U-2 Spy Plane
(Picture 2)

The air cushion makes this kind of low-level flight safe. Those WIG-flaps are tested in carrier-operative fast attack aircraft because that allows the plane attack against ships at very low altitude and high speed. But that technology can give more capacity for cargo-aircraft, what carries very heavy cargo because it can give the extra upthrust to airplanes.


WIG aircraft could be very large, and that’s why it fascinates many actors. Those aircraft can carry troops and tanks to beaches at very high speed. And this is the reason, why the Soviet Union tested high-speed low-flight amphibious aircraft in Caspian sea. This aircraft was delayed, but the smaller craft would be still in service. The similar technology what is used in WIG-aircraft can also give the airplane capacity to fly extra high altitude.


If the wing of the aircraft would equip with the flaps, what is turning downwards that would dam the air under the wing. This would help aircraft to fly in the stratosphere. If under the outer edge of the wing would be put the small plate, what is downwards, can it stop the stabilization of pressure and even that gives high-altitude aircraft like U-2 spy-plane capacity to fly extreme high altitude, but then all the wing would make overpressure under their area, the airplane would fly even higher.  And if the motor would get oxygen from the bottle, it would give thrust in the near the limit of space.

Sources:


https://www.instagram.com/p/Bfyc-3NFctG/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_U-2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wy0UNvL37vo

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SjuZGQ3NzN4

Picture 1:

https://www.instagram.com/p/Bfyc-3NFctG/

Picture 2:

https://www.forces.net/sites/default/files/U2spyplane.jpg

Complex political triangle in the international politics, authoritarian governments, great natural resources and nuclear weapons

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Most of the wars are reasons the economic conditions.The war of natural resources was also Hitler excuse for Barbarossa. And before that for the attack to Poland. "Lebensraum" was the excuse for the attack to Poland. But real reasons were the oil of Bessarabia. For that object must German army open the door to the Soviet Union. And the German people were told that those attacks are caused by the need to connect those areas, where was living German people in Germany. If the oil fields would be attacked by nuclear weapons, what would use against troops what are fighting in that area, would the destruction be very total, the troops that are serving in that area would be eliminated, but the infrastructure would also be destroyed. That would because many problems when the oil production would be restarted. Those problems would be that this area is polluted by radioactive material, and also the oil production systems what have been in that area should rebuild.


Those nations that are targeted to strike have many times dictatorship or the authoritarian way to control the people in their model of leading the state. The situation of the political leadership, the model of leading the nation is not so simple as people normally thinks. Many people ask why those governments would not be fallen by military forces, but those actions would make many deaths in those areas. And of course the western pilots and other military personnel, who operates in that are are always in danger. If the nuclear weapons are used in those countries, would those weapons sweep the opposing military forces out of the area, but those weapons would also destroy the oil refineries from those areas.


Dictatorship is the model of the state in many nations, what have very much natural resources. And that makes them perfect target for military actions, but also we must remember that those countries are independent nations, and the great natural resources of their area are always causing the problems because those national leaders can choose their own supporters. The problem of those authoritarian leaders of the nation is that those governments are actually confessed in United Nations.


And this makes the situation very difficult and complex. Those nations the social and economic differences are very strong. And some cases normal person, who lives in those countries cannot even write their own name. And the only book, what they have ever kept in their hands is Koran. That makes those people very good target for provocateurs, who would promise them the place in paradise if they would join terrorist groups.


The problem with dictatorship is that those nations have no opposite force for their leaders, who would not get information of the consequence of their orders. Or they would get information, what involves only positive things about their decisions. They would not see the other side of their orders, what could cause something, what they won't even think. If the maker for decision would not see every side of the thing, the decision would be someway unthinkable.


Every leader of the nation needs the opposition, that those leaders see another part of the problem, what might be more complex than the rulers ever thought. Then we are thinking of the situation when the Soviet Union was a collapse, the world was tuned right. There was not socialism anymore, and workers were lost their supporter, was the message, what was told to people. When we are starting to think the opinions of the working people, they would not get support from the Soviet Union as much as people thought. The reason for turning right was that the fear of the Soviet Union was dammed many things in the society to the left wing, and in rumors, every mayday parade was caused by the Soviet Union.


The laws changed to right, and the society works like some kind of water. When people would transfer the water to another side of the pool,  there would be a giant wave. The collapse of the Soviet Union released the wave, what fell to the right side of society. In that time the socialism was fallen, and this thing caused the social room, where the only real ideology was marketing economy. That thing caused the situation, where nobody had power in parliament to say nothing against the right wing laws, what was not very well organized.


Because opposition was weak, there would be no reason to listen to their opinions. Many persons believe, that left-wing opposition presenter were protected by Soviet nuclear weapons.Why the government should ever hear other opinions of the laws, what it has right to adjust? In that situation, many people saw, that opposition was led by the Soviet Union, and when that supporter was left, there were no reasons to listen to opposition arguments. Now we can see the results of that kind of politics. In that time the Soviet Union was gone in history. There was not the boogeyman for media, what would use as the silencer. There was an intuition, that nothing was allowed to say against the Soviet Union, because if the leaders of that country would start nuclear attack immediately if some writings don’t support it.


This is left the very bad thing in our political commonwealth. The fear of nuclear strike has given us the journals, where is sometimes glamorize the Russian nuclear arsenal. That arsenal is of course very large, but in those writings the only thing, what is mentioned is that Russia has the world's largest Nuclear weapons, and that’s it. If the leaders of that nation would not like the writings, it would use its nukes immediately. And this is very short-term way of thinking. The war is the cause of the economic situation or attempts to get economic advantages of those areas.


And if somebody would use nuclear weapons against the targeted country, the results would be, that all infrastructure of that nation would be destroyed. In this case, the nuclear weapons would cause the situation, that all cities of the opponent are rumbled to dust. Also, large land areas would be polluted, and that causes that the nuclear weapons make those land areas dangerous to use. The cleaning of those areas would take very long period, and the economy of that area would be the break. So the financial advantages could be very small from those areas where nuclear weapons have been used. So this limits sometimes the will of using those ultimate weapons against some nations.

What is MIRV (Multiple independently targetable reentry vehicle)?

W87 Warheads on MIRV-bus
 (Picture 1)

Kimmo Huosionmaa People normally ask what actually means term MIRV? The term means that nuclear missile carries many warheads, what it can target to the same point or different locations on the enemy ground. This means that one “Sarmat” missile can destroy one big area or 24 cities around the world. Term MRV (Maneuverable Reentry Vehicle) means normally that nuclear missile carries warheads, what can change their course during flight. This weapon is very devastating, and it can avoid kinetic energy ABM (Anti Ballistic Missile) system. That warhead is equipped with sensors, what notices the incoming ABM-rocket, and then it starts to turn, what makes the direct hit to target very difficult. Intercontinental ballistic missiles would operate many ways, and there would be many advantages in that equipment since 1960’s. Modern missiles are equipped with artificial intelligence, what makes the defense against them difficult. First, the hit to enemy ground would happen that some warheads detonated in orbital trajectory. That would cause damages to radars and other equipment, what are guided those ABM-systems. Also, some of those warheads could probably return to Earth and re-installed to missiles. That makes the threatening with those weapons more effective because those weapons can send to the skies and park over the enemy capital city. And if the war would begin, those weapons can strike with warning time, what takes seconds.

Sources:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_independently_targetable_reentry_vehicle

Picture 1.

http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/Usa/Weapons/W87clr.jpg

Submarine of tomorrow might be the robot.

Viktor III class nuclear attack submarine
(Picture 1)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

When we are talking about underwater drones, we must say, that submarines of tomorrow are probably fully automated drones, what can operate years in the sea. In some visions, there would be two types of drone-submarines. Another type looks like submarines, what is already existed. They have large room inside their hull, and those vessels might equip with supercomputers, what can use sophisticated artificial intelligence. They would patrol on the seas without a crew, and those submarines are actually already existed. Russian “Status-6” is a good example of that kind of drone submarine, what patrols alone at sea and those vessels are equipped with two 50 megaton thermonuclear bombs.

“Status-6” is probably actually “Viktor” or similar submarine, what is converted as a drone, what can strike any coastal target on Earth. Also, those robot submarines might have defensive and offensive subsystems like torpedos and tactical missiles, what it can use against other submarines and surface warships. But this is only the part of the underwater drone technology. Automatisation of submarines is very easy, because they are big size, and the nuclear reactors give lots of electric power. So those vessels can equip with very powerful computers, what makes independent operations possible because they will give enough computing power to those vessels.

Another type of military underwater drones is extremely long range torpedos. Those torpedos seem like normal torpedoes, but they are equipped with RTG (Radio Thermal Generators) and nuclear warheads. That kind of small midget submarines can patrol years on the sea, and when they would get orders, those vehicles can attack against any target, what is traveling in the sea. The warheads of those torpedoes are the size of 2-15 kilotons. Those midget submarines might also carry nuclear missiles. Those missiles are put inside the torpedo, or they would be connected to the front of the torpedo. When this vehicle gets an order to shoot, it would rise to launching depth, and turn up the missile. Then that missile would be launched from the deep blue sea.

Modern nuclear submarines also have sub-drones for supporting their missions. There are rumors, that Russian and U.S Navies have equipped their missile submarines with remote controlled SDV (Swimmer Delivery Vehicles), what are using torpedos. Those drones can use in a combat situation for shooting another submarine. Also, those submarines have “reconnaissance torpedos”. This means the torpedo-size recon vessel, what can slip in the harbors. The reconnaissance drones can also use to look the targets for the submarine. In this case, the submarine can stay very deep, and send the drone to look for surface targets.


That drone sends it data with LRAD- or blue-green laser light modems to submarine, what can stay in cover. Those submarines can also have robots, what uses manipulators for underwater recovery and minesweeping operations. Those CURV (Controlled Underwater Recovery Vehicle) submarines can recover secret devices, what are dropped in the sea, and they can also use to sweep mines from the coast before the attack to the beach. CURV vehicles were used to return the hydrogen bombs, what dropped in the sea when B-52 bomber got the trouble in the Spanish coast during the Cold war.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CURV

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Status-6_Oceanic_Multipurpose_System

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jason_(ROV)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SEAL_Delivery_Vehicle

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ixS80cTztzU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hdw2CMKhZ9k

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LI2nQYqobeo

Picture 1

https://www.navyrecognition.com/images/stories/news/2016/november/Submarine_project_671RTMK_Pike_k-138_Obninsk.jpg

The “Sarmat” missile

"Sarmat" missile
(Picture 1)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

“Sarmat” is nothing like any other ICBM. This weapon is mobilized version of the SS-18 (R36) missile, what was the largest thermonuclear weapon in the world. It has more warheads and capacity to raise those weapons in the orbital trajectory. This weapon is actually FOBS (Fractional Orbital Bombardment System”, what is tested by the Soviet Union and the possible USA in 1960’s. Those weapons have huge weapons load, what makes them very terrible. In those weapons is MIRV (Multiple Independently Targeted Reentry Vehicles) what can be targeted to same target or different places around the world. This kind of FOBS-weapons can send to orbital trajectory weeks or even years before shooting order.


They can play normal satellites, and when the order of action comes, the satellite would start to drop nuclear weapons to their targets. This eliminates the way to locate those weapons by using its communication signals as the tip. If those weapons could be located, there is the way to target them with high-altitude ASAT systems. The thing why those nuclear weapons would not locate very easily is that they can work with the normal satellites. And when those weapons are needed, the programs of the computers must only change, what makes those satellites the ultimate killers.


Those warheads are actually independently targeted and they can use like carpets, where all warheads would be put in the same place. But those FOBS weapons have the very frightened capacity, that they could be sent to the orbital trajectory, and then dropped one by one in many targets, what is separated from together. Also “Sarmat” can drop one warhead and leave other to MIRV-bus waiting for next target. Those weapons can be programmed to explode in the orbital trajectory, in the atmosphere or they can program to hit the ground in the line, and that kind of weapons can destroy even the command center of NORAD.


FOBS capacity makes that weapon so terrible. It can be used against highly mobile targets, and it can threat also U.S task fleet and submarines. Those weapons would be used with reconnaissance satellites, what are looking for “hard to find easy to kill” targets for that weapon. The capacity to use one warhead by one is because this weapon must find those highly mobile targets before it can take effect to them.

Sources:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractional_Orbital_Bombardment_System

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R-36_(missile)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RS-28_Sarmat

Picture 1.

https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/PC-24_%C2%AB%D0%AF%D1%80%D1%81%C2%BB-1024x684.jpg

The problems with SADM (Special Atomic Demolition Munition)

(Picture 1)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

When we are talking about special nuclear devices, what came in the public knowledge with the Frederick Forsyth’s book “The 4th. protocol”. Those small size atomic ammunition would bring to the country in pieces, and they could put to use from pieces. That kind of devices uses of course highly radioactive material, and they could be seen by sensors, what would detect nuclear radiation. That kind of weapons is not very difficult to make if the makers have right materials in their hands. In that book, some KGB officials would make a terrorist attack by using this kind of device for setting up the nuclear accident.


But when we are thinking that fictional book, we might write the new end for it. This new end would be that somebody would traffic the nuclear material from Russia to the dark operations. A problem with nuclear material is the high control. If somebody steals that material, the productions of chain reaction would help to locate the place, where that material is coming from. And by trafficking the nuclear material from Russia, would the makers of that device hire their identity, if they are western citizens.


This is why I’m concerning about the Polonium murder of Alexander Litvinenko because that material would need the thing, what is called as “luminous badge”. This thing works as a neutron source in cannon devices, what are not normally used in military weapons. But in this case, canon device could be more sophisticated than implosion mechanism. Another good material for the neutron source could be Radium. This part is the thing what is targeted by a piece of Plutonium, and it boosts the neutron impact to inside that device. This device would have no safety systems, and it could be very dangerous in wrong hands.


But the thing is not so simple as persons usually think. The nuclear device would not necessarily cause the death of the manufacturer, and those pieces of nuclear material would not send enough radiation, that alarm system would launch. Those nuclear devices can be packed in the water tanks, and the water would be great isolation material for radiation. Why I’m concerning about this thing, is that somebody could steal highly radioactive Polonium-isotope from the laboratory. And maybe this same person could steal highly fissile nuclear material from the reactors or from nuclear waste.


Those pieces of plutonium can carry inside the water tank or they can also close in the rubber ball, what is covered with gold leaf. And that would isolate those radioactive rays from outside. And that would cause the very risky situation. If that kind of device would be built, the structure of that atomic weapon would not be very complicated.


There would be one tube, where is one piece of plutonium. That tube would be loaded with explosives, what would shoot the bite of plutonium inside another bite of this material. And if the builder wants would he use Polonium plate as the booster for neutron source. If somebody wants to use this kind of device in terror-attack, the results would be very horrible and devastating.

Sources:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poisoning_of_Alexander_Litvinenko

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DyTbRQKROpY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F6438AsuA6Y

Picture 1.

https://i.stack.imgur.com/SDzpF.jpg

The next generation solar panels can be installed on every roof

The City of Porvoo, black square on back is the
church of this town

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Silicon solar panels are all black, and they have been used in satellites long time. They would transfer the light to the electricity, and those panels are extremely lightweight. But they are also very easy to install on the roofs, and no outsider would ever notice that on the roof is installed solar panels. The answer for installation problems is that those panels would be drilled the holes in the factory, where screws or nails can be put, and the installation of those elements is as difficult as a normal roof material. Those solar panels would be covered by bulletproof glass, what would be protected the silicon layer. The electric wires might be pulled inside the house by the way, that they would not disturb the shape of the house. So this solution is suitable also for historic houses, which shape must not be broken with modern things.


The problem has been holes, what must be drilled in the glass, but the laser drill is the answer for that process. When the holes are drilled on the solar panel, there would be put steel socket, and then screws would be set thru it. The weather in Finland might change and the difference of temperature on summer and winter is huge. So those holes must be a little bit too big, that changing the size of elements would not cause wrecks in the material. Solar panels would not operate perfectly in winter, but bright days those systems might stable the use of central power plants.



This kind of systems would help the production of electricity in the state. When we are thinking about the use of green energy in large-scale solutions, we must say that there would not be the right answer, what might be the best version of the power solution for entire cities. The answer would be a hybrid solution, where the powerful central power plants are assisted with smaller units. One good solution would be solar power, what can be installed on the roofs, and that would not need new areas for those power units.


 I always have wondered, why the electricity of cities cannot base in many smaller units, what are easier to adjust and control. The big units can be used in factories and other things like that. The small size power plants would be sized as the containers, and they can use fuel cells to produce electricity. The fuel cells can give very high voltages, and they are noiseless. Fuel cells can produce electricity in any burning gas or hydrocarbon like methane, and fuel cells can also make electricity straight without turbines and generators.

Black budget aircraft and commandos are deadly combination

AN-26 cargo plane
(Demo photo, what has no connection with this text)
(Picture 1)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The term “Black budget aircraft” is normally misunderstood as some special technology platform, what is not actually true. This term means aircraft, what is built or other ways furnished from outside the bookkeeping. Money for those aircraft would be routed from other projects. This kind of aircraft might consist of civilian aircraft, what would not want to track to the air forces. Those aircraft might use in some anti-narcotics operations, or picking up agents from hostile areas.


In the case of CIA, those aircraft might be Russian origin Antonov cargo planes or Ilyushin passenger planes, what mission is to support the missions of special forces and CIA agents in hostile areas. Those aircraft would carry weapons and other equipment for operators, who operate in areas, what are hostile to the United States or NATO. Sometimes those planes might have false national markings, and their missions are almost every times classified, but the same planes can be operated by DEA, what wants to use them in covert operations against drug dealers.


In those operations, the most important role is trusting. And that is the reason, why those aircraft might need to carry drugs sometimes before those men would meet the boss of the gang. When we are talking about weapon trafficking to “friendly forces”, we must notice, that those weapons might be equipped with GPS-systems, what makes them easy to track.Those weapons might deliver to enemy troops on purpose. And when those weapons are in the hands of hostile troops, there might be dropped the GPS-guided bomb in the position, where those troops would stay.


I once read the thought what was written by some commando. The thought was the strike what would do by using enemy cargo-planes. It was that the big cargo aircraft would land in enemy airbase, and then the strike-unit drives from the ramp with Humvees, what are equipped with machine guns and anti-tank weapons. Then they would strike against enemy installations with 50. caliber machine guns and anti-tank missiles. That could cause very bad losses to persons, who are working in that military base. This could be another version if the strikes, what  British SAS special forces did in North Africa against Rommel's forces or Israel did to Entebbe in 1976, this strike is also known as "Operation Thunderbolt".


In some scenarios, the very big airplanes like IL-76 can be transformed as the missiles, what would flight to target via remote control. In some scenarios, the tanker aircraft would fill with nitroglycerin. Then they would fly against the target. That kind of devices is very dangerous in wrong hands. In some scenarios, the remotely controlled cargo-plane would be landed to the enemy airbase, and it would be filled with remote-controlled Humvees or other Jeeps, what are equipped with explosives. Then those vehicles would just drive to enemy aircraft line and they could be exploded. The results of this kind of strike could be devastating.

Sources:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Entebbe

https://warontherocks.com/2017/02/the-secret-war-that-transformed-the-cia/

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-12-15/weapons-went-cia-isis-less-two-months-new-study-reveals

Picture 1.

http://duibe7slt06r7.cloudfront.net/Live/Binaries/en-US/images/Antonov%20AN-26%20IMG%204_tcm61-41333.jpg

The miniature and remote controlled space laboratories and their role in science

Artists impression of X-37B with solar panels
(Picture 1)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The term “space station” is not very well understood in the literature.It actually means the structure, what has long-term being in space, and some of those structures are quite small, the laboratories of those vehicles are remotely controlled. The X-37B and other space shuttles can also operate as miniaturized space stations, and they can stay in orbital trajectory very long time. Because they are unmanned, there would make investigations without risking human lives, and that would give more usages for those devices. When the mission is accomplished that space laboratory would land back to earth.


When we are talking about biological experiments, what are made with those small size spacecraft, they can operate years in space. And there would be no risk for human lives. In those remotely controlled laboratories could be released mosquitos and other bugs, and observe their population in the spacecraft. That could give very good information what could happen in spacecraft where some bug would slip in. Also, cell bases can be tested in long-term spaceflight because the risk of cancer might be very big if astronauts would be in space very long periods.


Those very advanced laboratories are remote controlled, and they are equipped with robot hands, what would be used to taking care of those laboratories. The automatized space laboratories could also use in structural tests, where they might equip with systems, what makes electromagnetic power shield around the spaceship. This shield would drive the alpha- and beta rays off the spacecraft core. But those systems might be dangerous because overvoltage can cause problems with computers.


Cargo bay of space-shuttles can be used to bring the asteroids to Earth. The space shuttle can take small stones from the asteroid belt, and put them in the cargo bay. There those rocks would investigate by microscopes and spectrometers, and the most interesting of them might bring to the Earth. Those small shuttles can operate anywhere in the solar system, and they can equip with RTG, and Centaur-stage for maneuvers. Maybe this kind of devices would send to Jovian and Saturnian orbiter to find out the situation in those systems.


If there would be enough big rocket stage in that device, that shuttle can bring the examples from those gas giants to Earth. When they are coming back, the rocket stage would be left this rocket stage behind it. And land in any airfield on Earth. Those missions would spend years, and the use of automatic spacecraft would give those scientists opportunity to do other projects than this one. And that miniature shuttle can be equipped with sophisticated artificial intelligence, what allows them to operate very independently. And if there would bring something, what risks human lives on Earth, could that spaceship burn in sun.

Sources

Picture 1

https://cdn.disclose.tv/sites/default/files/styles/video_image/public/img/po