Writing about harassment in social life

Copyright of picture Disney studios

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The social position of the people is very easy to see. Many people have terrible behaviors like give orders to another person all time. That kind of behavior is a very common thing for the people, who are grown in societies, where their parents have some kind of position, where they can give orders to another person. But there is one type of person, who might be interesting in the eye of an investigator. Those persons are very well known people because they make everybody feel uncomfortable.


When somebody comes to work, he or she might know if that person begins to yell, because that tiresome people have a mark that he or she begins to scream to another person. That means that this person has a support in the community because he or she uses a mark when he or she starts that action. This next episode is mentioned in some data security handbook, and I write it as I remember that story, because I read that book about 20 years ago.  So if something goes wrong, please try to understand.


We all know a story of the boss, who has slips for every mental situation, and there is one slip, what other persons in workplace hate very much. It is a slip, what that person uses when he or she starts to yell to other members of society. In some societies, there is a way how to haze some people. That color might be marked to all team, to begin to harass some member of the society. If we are looking for newspapers or some other public media, we might see that in some writings are marks that the reporter will give some kind of orders, how to haze other people. This might be imagined, but somehow the same kind of slips went in the neck of that club members and one person, who didn’t have slips found his car, with its tires empty. So was there a connection or not, that is the question.


And somebody has been talked, that pink slips in some societies is a mark to begin haze with sexual behaviors or something like that. Why I’m writing about this? After some news begins some people start to wear pink slips, and those persons were part of the same golf club, and in workplaces began some kind of intimation about some person’s sexual behavior. After that one member of the team got a telephone call, where he or she got nice advice to change a workplace immediately. And there was mentioned some things, what were so-called "personal information". That was a mark, that those people had a chance to get some confidential files in their hands, and that was not very nice to heard.


That text was mentioned that person, who was recognized as this person was someway hated. I have heard some rumors that in some Ice-hockey or basketball league players support team works some "media agents", whose mission is to annoy players. Those people write very poignantly texts to social media about those players, who will not satisfy them.  And all players have mentioned as code names and when somebody is mentioned to be hated, that means, that this particular person will get lots of bad feedback from social media. I don't know if this is the only rumor.


Actually in that competition was used a phrase, that they don’t find jobs for that person, so why he or she is sitting there? The connection between those writings and slips seems to be very clear. Those slips are maybe marked for that this particular person has paid ransoms, that he or she won’t get harassed in the workplace.

"Operation Anthropoid" a plan to murder "The man with the iron heart"

Heydrich's car after a bomb strike 

Kimmo Huosionmaa

“Operation Anthropoid” was SOE:s  (Service Operation Executive) operation to murder the chief of SS- and police Reinhard Heydrich (1904-1942)  in 1942. That operation staff was two Czechoslovakian resistance men Jozef Gabčík and Jan Kubiš. That strike was made with modified hand grenades, what was thrown under Reinhard Heydrich Mercedes. Some people think that some of those FAE-grenades were also put some botulinum toxin, but those are only rumors. But here I must say that this kind of operation is quite unusual, and then it would be interesting to know, what made Reinhard Heydrich so important, that this particular man must be eliminated.



In the Second World War SOE made two other plan to murder leading Nazi-officials. In 1944 SOE:s headquarters in London two other elimination plans, another was “Operation Foxley”, what was attempted to murder Adolf Hitler, and third was “Operation Kutschera”, what was targeted against the chief of police Franz Kutschera. Second of those actions was made by Polish resistance, and even “Operation Foxley” was something like unnecessary action. The reason what made those operations so the suspect was that happened not until 1944. In my personal opinion is that those operations must be done just beginning of the war.

Reinhard Heydrich
(1904-1942)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Anthropoid

So here my personal thinking starts to ring itself and I must ask, why Reinhard Heydrich was the man, who was assassinated by British intelligence? He was SS-Obergruppenführer und General der Polizei und  Waffen-SS, but what made him different than his successor Dr. Ernst Kaltenbrunner, who was mentioned as the most feared man in the Third Reich. Many people thought that Reinhard Heydrich would be the successor of Adolf Hitler, but why this operation was accomplished, and there is much mysticism around this operation. How did one British Stirling bomber could flight across occupied Europe, without fear of shooting down?


That plane carried those strikers to Czechoslovakia from the Great Britain, and nobody ever noticed it, and if that plane would shoot down, the plan would be uncovered. Or maybe “Operation Anthropoid” wouldn’t uncover, but German police would know that those men were in Czechoslovakia, and this is one great mystery of the SOE. That mystery is, how this intelligence service could ever imagine, that German night fighters ever drop a single airplane. Even if Germans wouldn’t get information about the agents, the routine patrolling night fighters could easily drop those alone flying bombers. So why those drops were in so big role.

Why the assassinator used so uncommon material in the crimes, what connected those murders straight to KGB?

Kimmo Huosionmaa


When somebody wants to kill somebody else, that person might choose something usual method. When we are talking about two murders what claimed to make under the control of KGB, we must just wonder, why that organization chose those methods, what conducted those murders straight to KGB or it Russian successor. Those murders are Grigori Markov's murder in 1978 and Alexander Litvinenko's murder in 2006.

That two murders were so uncommon, that they connected those assassinations straight to KGB. In the first case, the assassin used platinum pellet, where were two holes what filled with ricin- poison. The target was Bulgarian citizen, who moved to the west, and persons, who were believed be behind that case were members of Bulgarian intelligence.  That pellet was shot to Markov's leg with the air gun, what was masked as an umbrella.


I personally believe that the weapon, what was used in Markov's case used pressurized air because using of gunpowder could damage that ammunition, and throw the ricin out of those holes, and gunpowder is very easy to detect by dogs. The reason, why the suspect was found behind the Iron curtain, was that pellet was made platinum or sharper the constellation, what was used in that ammunition was the mixture of 90% of platinum and 10% of iridium. The problem of that ammunition was that was made so exotic metals. Why KGB didn't use something more common metal for that pellet is a big question.


The lead pallet would be easier to grind, because that metal is so soft, that it would be easier to drill. This is the very strange thing because simple cyanide spray to Markov's face could be enough. But the question is, why that man actually killed? Also, those pellets might easily to make with a material, what melt inside the target, and that ammunition might shoot with standard pistols or rifles. In those special bullets, the poison is mixed in the bonder material.


There was many more poets and writers who criticized the communist block, and those people didn't face their fate by the hand of KGB:s assassination. So why this particular man was ordered to get killed. What was the information, what he got from Bulgarians? Why it cost his life by the hand of an unknown killer? Nobody ever convicted about that time, so it is the official open case.


And why those who made that crime, used that kind of equipment, what are so easy to connect to those intelligence services. The Same question was about the murder of Alexandr Litvinenko. The poison, what was used, is so radioactive, that handling the material needed nanorobots or something like that. The nanorobot what was used in this crime might look like some kind of bug like Wasps, and it dropped polonium to morning coffee of Litvinenko.

Those equipment needs very highly trained people to accomplish the production of that robot bug, and of course, materials are also very important. There is needed highly trained programmers and engineers, that those nano bugs can use in real life. And of course, that robot needs also the mechanical components what can be done with 3D printers, and CAD programs. And that system needs also batteries, what can give electricity long enough, that the robot will accomplish its missions.


I wonder what could happen if that piece of polonium was slipped off that nanomachines jaws. That man was ex-colonel of KGB but using polonium, the assassinator connected that crime straight to Russian intelligence or special forces. If we make some analyzes about those crimes, I must ask one question. Is the use of that equipment meant to show all the world, that those men have absolute power in the Earth. That might be the reason, why thy choice for the method was so uncommon equipment like platinum bullets and very radioactive material, what has radioactive constant about 28 days. There is one mystery, that very radioactive material did not cause alarms in the borders of Great Britain.

Why radicalism is not the real answer to problems of the state?

Picture: Internet

Kimmo Huosionmaa

https://sites.google.com/view/whyradicalismisnotanswer/etusivu

The reason why traditional parties are back in popularity is that those "new age" parties can't reclaim the promises, what they have given to voters.  The power of populistic movements is that they promise something concrete to the people, but as it happened many times before those promises have been over limited when they are compared with resources of the state.


When some group begins to control the state, the limits will come from national funds. Those funds are the thing, what the government uses for paying its own payments to own citizens and of course to the other states. This fund is capital, what government uses if it must reclaim its money back from markets, and if there is too much money in the markets, it will collapse the value of money, if that money comes to markets.


That brings very strong disappointing for voters, who wanted to get those things, what those parties have been promised. And when those promises leave in the level of promises, will voters leave that party. When we are talking about radicalism in political control, we must say that radical movements are often driven their state to destruction. Example of that advantage is Bolshevik-revolution in Russia 1917 and rise of Nazi-government in Germany in 1930's.


Those movements were very radical, and that radical policy drove those states to war and then authoritarian government-controlling policy destroyed the economics of The Soviet Union, but the economics were a reason, why, Adolf Hitler attacked to Polland in 1939. The reason for the attack was that nazi-party took their popularity by promising work for the people, and they, of course, made many workplaces, but those workplaces were in the police force and military industry.


And of course, those workplaces were grown in public sectors, like building new houses for a new government. That made very bad losses for cash of the state, and then Hitler decided to attack against Poland because they wanted to rob that states money and national treasures. When economic situation is bad, will the people want new workplaces, but if those workplaces are only in the public sector, the economic situation will not able to fix. Only real marketing is an answer to the bad economic situation because public workplaces are only money holes for the government.

Dangers about psychological operations where authorities use infra-voice systems

LRAD (Long Range Acoustic Device) in action

Kimmo Huosionmaa

https://sites.google.com/view/dangersofinfravoicesystems/etusivu

Have you ever seen movies what are directed John Carpenter? In on of his movies named "The mouth of madness" was a psychological "virus", what made people behave very violent way to other people. This particular movie, what made me think terrible thoughts, what so-called infra-voice systems might be caused in wrong hands, and with those systems might somebody do terrible things to other people.  Making of that kind of systems is quite easy, and only thing, what that person must do, is to change normal stereos frequency as they loudspeakers will work in infra-voice.


There are rumors that some discotheques used that kind of system to pairing people. In those rumors, they used subliminal so-called flash-pictures and infra-voice to force people to sex with other people. I don't know if this true, but those systems are so easy to build, that some discos might be grown their sell with this kind of tricks  Those systems are created by law enforcement and military personnel, for propaganda operations.  There is a great risk that that kind of systems will be targeted to people, who don't know about them. And even if some persons will know about that equipment they probably can't resist those voice signals.


The horrifying thing, what somebody can do, is start to play that kind of propaganda in radios, and if they will use wrong messages, would result be devastating. SWAT-teams have LRAD (Long Range Acoustic Device)-base systems, what they can use in hostage situations. Those targeted sound systems look like M-209 grenade launchers, but there is a microphone in the trunk of the tube, what is installed on the gun. Those systems are made for extreme situations, where hostages are in danger, and those officers must use that system to get the criminal lay down his gun.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_Range_Acoustic_Device

But if they will say "do it" in a wrong time, the result must be horrifying, and if that happened in Waco, Texas in 1993 when suicide cult burned themselves alive, was this kind of system show how dangerous it could be in wrong hands. I always thought, that if hostage rescue teams negotiator said "do it" just after Koresh have been given his speech to people, where he provoked his people to kill themselves, the result might be clear, and people saw that in their TV. Those systems are very dangerous, and somebody claimed, that some mafia or governments personnel have misused that equipment in their own actions like growing their business.


And if that kind of systems is used by salesmen, they might make good results, but the method to use infra-voice systems in business life might get those people in the court of law. But there is a conspiracy theory, where are mentioned, that some mass shootings might cause by using this kind of systems. I don't know if this is true, but if those systems used in criminal activities, the results could be horrifying.

Writing about threats of modern military drones

Kimmo Huosionmaa

https://sites.google.com/view/treatsofmoderndrones/etusivu

When we are talking about new era combat robots, we must understand why those kind of weapon systems are creating in many laboratories around the world. If some army or air force will begin to use robots on the battlefield, they don't have worry about losses, because in those operations will not cause human casualties on the side, what uses robots on the battlefield.


Robots are very good weapons because if we think about robot airplanes, they can be airborne even for years.  Robot bombers and fighters are actually an upgraded versions of cruise missiles. The main difference between robot fighter and a cruise missile is that robot fighter or bomber uses sub-munitions to attack the targets. But also those robot planes might equip with internal warheads.


So those planes might use as a kamikaze if there is enough important target for those planes. But this kind of systems will cause a terrible situation in the air. If standard cruise missiles are equipped with sub missiles, and they would have the capacity to go air combat, the result could be devastating, if fighter pilots don't know about the situation, where cruise missiles have anti-aircraft missiles. Those systems might look like missiles, but they have the capacity to go air battle. Modern combat robots are very autonomic units. They can equip with advanced artificial intelligence, what makes them immune for ECM-systems.


And they have image detectors, what makes them possible to identify any targets, what are allowed to attack. Those image recognization systems make possible to pick armed persons from streets and open the fire against them. But those image scanning programs makes possible to use UCAV:s (Unmanned Combat Aerial Vehicles) to kill some precise targets. If those systems are mounted to combat drones, what is actually "X" -helicopters, what is equip with machine guns,  they might be very dangerous.


Network-based computing infrastructure makes drone musters very good but same time very dangerous part of military technology. Anybody can buy toy helicopter, and equip it with rifle ammunition, what can launch by the electric spark by the same kind of equipment that is used in remote-controlled bombs. And those drones can be equipped with electric winches, what pulls the trigger back with wire. And those guns ammunition might be installed with the trunk of the gun, what allows to install 360 degrees turning stand for that weapon. Aiming that system might happen with cameras, and they might be useful in anti-sniper operations. But those weapons can be very dangerous in wrong hands.


This systems base is a system, where computers share their calculating capacity between them, and even if those drones have very many limits in their computer systems, the shared computing makes possible to make autonomic drone muster, what will use for the attack against any target. Those drone musters might be acting as a group when e attacking airplane comes, they will rise in the path of that plane, and try to guide those drones inside it motors, and that will cause loss of that airplane.

Oh mister did you talk to the dead?

Writing about fears and phobias 

Kimmo Huosionmaa

https://sites.google.com/view/aboutfearsandphobias/etusivu

Have you ever heard a psychiatrist ask the patient "did you talk to the dead"? That kind of things might be thought to say by a psychotic person, but if we are thinking about things when some person who is under some kind of psychotic disorder claims that, they might not able to articulate their speech clearly.


Those people might not even speak English, and that's why their worlds are easy to misunderstand. They might mean, that they saw some persons, who they thought be dead.  If some children or old people say, that he or she saw dead people walking on the street, they might not be mad.


That worlds might mean, that those children or young person see somebody who has the same kind of faces like some dead people on the street, but limits about communication make that speech very hard to understand. They might see somebody who is identical with some dead person, and that's why that "storyteller" tells to the people, that he or she was in contact with dead people.


There is a psychological test, what mission is to show if some person is made the murder. That test is very simple. The victim's cousin or some other person, who looks like victim dresses like that person. And if the suspect starts to shake or feels uncomfortable that might mean that person has something to hide with that case.


There are many fear types what are called phobias. Some of those fears are the cause of traumatized childhood. And if somebody sees ghosts, when he or she goes to sleep, those ghosts might be some kind traumatized memories. Those memories might be very strong, and cause that the patient screams in the night, and that person is very stressed if he comes to the place where trauma begins.


If somebody were in trouble in England, because the bus almost drove them to die, those people will fear the British bus rest of their life. In that situation where that person has kept that kind of things secret, will he or she see that situation every time, when that person comes to the place, what looks like that place, where the accident happened?


And those reactions will tell to the investigators, that the person is hiding something. But now we must ask one question. "Why somebody hides accident?". The reason might be that the person was in that place doing something that that person doesn't want to tell his or her parents. Some phobias take effect when the person has faced something terrible. If some person afraid elevators, that might be choked in some elevator, or if that person affairs some places like basements the reason might be very serious. Those people might be faced attack or some other traumatic situations in the basement of some house. That's why the reason for phobias must always be investigated.


That thing might be alcohol drinking as an underage person, and if that person went to the trouble and was pushed by the vehicle he or she might not tell that thing to anybody. And if that person's skin were scratched he or she might explain them by falling or slipping. That makes those things very traumatic because that person must think those things alone. Those things might cause very serious traumatization, and they might bring back their memories after years.

Analysis of the book named The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes

Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
1859-1930

Kimmo Huosionmaa

I sometimes wonder, why Sir Arthur Conan-Doyle (1859-1930) wrote the fictional book or novel series “The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes”. There is a portrait of Victorian detective, who just concludes who is guilty of some crimes. By the way, all other stories of that book are murder cases, only two novels make difference about that kind thing. Those stories are  “The scandal in Bohemia” and “The red-headed league”, where criminals will make operations for stealing important things. And in the first story, Holmes can’t catch the thief. By the way, this master detective ever catches thieves. They all will slip away. But this man is very tough for murderers he catches them all.


 There are other stories about thieves in that book, and in all thief stories will those criminals slip off, but Holmes catches all murderers.  But after “The Red-headed league” will those stories change to the darker side, and the crime what is under investigation is a murder, what is made by the most intelligent and cold-blooded murdered.  When we are looking or reading the tales of Sherlock Holmes, we might see a painting in this master detectives wall.


That painting is a portrait of one waterfall in the Switzerland, and in the end of first part of that book, will the master detective fall into that waterfall by the hand of the leader of London underworld professor Moriarty. That painting is the very important thing in that Victorian detective tale because it is mentioned in many novels in that book. But why that possible quite cheap picture is so huge thing in that man’s life? Does it show the place for that man, where he can set up his death?


When we are thinking about the text, what has been written by Sir Arthur Conan-Doyle, we must recognize that this master detective Sherlock Holmes knows very many things about London underworld. How does he know that somebody who stands at the opposite of street is a killer? The detective of those stories is very strange because he doesn’t use any more technical instruments than his famous magnifier. But in those stories is very much strange details, what are the “I” portrait of that book.


Dr. Watson who just walk behind Holmes and tries to follow his thinking.  He also lives with that master detective, so somebody thinks, that this thing in that book was meant insinuation of the homosexual relationship between those men. When we are thinking about that particular painting, I sometimes think that if that picture was a proof that Mr. Sherlock Holmes was a member of some kind of network. If Conan-Doyle wrote about memberships of secret societies, he must hide his message to other text.



So if that man wanted to hide something, what he also wanted to publish, he would write just like he did in his detective stories masterpieces. But the waterfalls of  Reichenbach can’t become from Conan-Doyle’s imaginations. So why that man chose the death place of Professor Moriarty and Sherlock Holmes those waterfalls in Switzerland.


Why didn't he chose the death place to Victoria Falls or Niagara Falls? And even if Sir Arthur Conan-Doyle returned his detective back to life in his next novels? How many times a writer has served his readers so god, that he returns his or her portrait or main character back to life? Why he continued his work with that character, even if he was boring to write stories about him? Was he so good customer server, that he asked his readers or "fans"  what they want to read by him?


So I think that some parts of this detective stories are made for money. and the writer took a price for those stories.  I mean that they must be written for some purpose if somebody paid Conan-Doyle about those works, that person must be a very big fan of that writer, and I understand that those texts, what Conan-Doyle sent to The Strand Magazine were open for the people but did Conan-Doyle sent his first stories to that newspaper accidentally, and did he ever going to publish those stories? But was those stories mentioned to be faked police reports, or why Conan-Doyle wrote those novels, what pleasure us even today? That is the very good question when we analyze that brilliant book of Detective Sherlock Holmes from the Victorian age when skirts were long and men wear silk hats when they will go to walk.

Narcotics policy is a very difficult thing

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Narcotics policy is a very difficult thing. Even if we will release narcotic users from punishments what consists drug use, and we will give them free methadone, the will face a very difficult problem. When the policy with narcotics is under construction, the laws must be made that way, that users of drugs can tell their information to the police without fear of revenge, and they must have the cure for their addiction. The problem is that narcotic users might make other crimes before they will come to the methadone program.



And those crimes might be very serious like street violence, robberies and attack against police. Those crimes must take to the justice system, and other society can't accept that kind of actions against other people. Legalization of marijuana is not the same thing as the legalization of heroin or fentanyl. That is the thing, what everybody must understand.


 When we are talking about drug marketing and legalization of narcotics we normally think that if narcotics will be legal, that very dangerous stuff will pull out from hands of the criminals. But there is a small little problem with drug users. They might not have the sense of responsibility, and that's why they might sell their methadone to other people, to get money for telephones or music-equipment.


Those narcotics makes people addicting much more dangerous way than normal alcohol. In some countries is legal to give also strong drugs for narcotics user, if they need medical attention for withdrawal symptoms. Those symptoms make those people very angry and impulsive, what means same as dangerous.  But in real life, there is a little danger, that somebody who is not narcotics user will come to test those drugs.


Drug policy is very difficult thing to handle. It's difficult to make good laws about this very difficult and complex problem. The problem with legal drugs is how to block those stuff from the people, who doesn't still use them. This is a nucleus of that problem, how to deny drug dealers and user to sell those stuff to underage people, who can't take care themselves.


So the answer to the problem is that those users can go to "drug hotel" or hospital and take them dose but they are not allowed to take those stuff out. So I think that if we will legalize drugs for every people, it will cause social problems, what is more, difficult to handle than if drugs are legal. But alcohol is a legal drug, and it causes also the very bad problem. I think that many people would never test drugs even if they are legal.


But the problem with drugs and alcohol are people, who addict very easy. I don't know is that because of genetics, but some people can't resist drugs.  When we are talking about drug policy, we will sometimes forget, that that stuff is very devastating, if they will put to some truck drivers coffee. And that is one reason because they are illegal. The use of drugs is the very big tragedy to all parts of that problem.


Users of drugs are sometimes very violent, and that's the problem with making laws about that thing. Some users make their families life hell, but if we will legalize narcotics, we might pull that merchandise out of hands of cocaine- or other drug cartels. This text is only thinking about this problem, and there is always another opinion about those things. But the most of the street violence is something connected with drug marketing. And this is one aspect, what we must realize when the laws are under construction.

Why somebody's mind is changing as a terrorist?

City of Sanaa: Yemen
(Picture Internet)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Why some people move to another country and makes ruthless terror action? This is a question, what the investigators should make when they are investigating the actions, what are the most horrifying, what any of the people can do?

That kind of actions are the full-scale terror against normal people, and those people, who do those horrifying thing gives reason to fight fire with fire. When some terrorists or how those people must be called, they give the reason for using the violence like air-raids against terrorist targets is legal action.

The problem with those strikes is that they might be against international law, but otherwise, we must say, that if some terrorist groups operate from some country, and the leaders of that country doesn't do anything to stop that kind of actions and take those men to the court of law, the airstrikes and another kind of actions are right for those people.


There is a little problem with international law, it doesn't take note that some governments do nothing to make terrorist strikes from their area impossible. And the problem with that kind of actions is that those people, who are already members of the terrorist organizations have only one change, fight to the resentful end. Those men are been kill many people and that's why they are also very hated men.


Leaders of those organizations will never be forgiven. Their actions are so notorious, that the only thing, what they can expect is death in some combat or death in some prison. They can't ever be members of any communities, and they have information, what some people would not want to become public. That's why those people never want to speak anything about their organization, and it's back office actors.


I believe that some leaders of those organization have sold assassinations for regular criminals to get medical and narcotics stuff, what they need in their operations and recruitment process, where those men purport some kind of angels.  In that process will the applicant give heroin in tea, and they will force to reiterate the mantras, what consists texts of the Koran.  That method is calling brainwashing. And it is very effective method when somebody wants to change human as a robot, who does anything, what this person wants.

Who benefits the crime is a key to find terrorist back forces

Picture: Internet

Kimmo Huosionmaa


Investigation of terrorism is similar than any other criminal investigation. The investigator's mission is to find out real criminals, and after that, the government can focus their mission on those persons, who will want to take in the court of law for crimes, what they have made. But as we see, the investigation of crimes begins the question, who benefits the crime.


Anybody in the world can yell "Allah Akbar" when he kills somebody, and in those cases, I think that some of those brutal actions are made for some other reasons than bringing the Islamic revolution to the west. This is a problem with an investigation of the terrorism.

Even if the striker is a fundamentalist, that doesn't mean that he or she is the member of that particular organization what he claims to represent. The world of terrorism is very complicated, and that's why the strikes mission is not always, what it looks like. The mission of the terrorism is sometimes to sic the strikes against the organization what is the striker's competitor.


Sometimes there have been rumors of the 1980's terrorism, that behind that violence was actually right-wing movement, who wanted to calumniate the socialist parties. Sometimes there have been wild rumors, that even the CIA has been supported those radical socialist movements, for decreasing the popularity of socialist parties.


But even if the background actor claimed that this person represents the CIA, that doesn't mean that this "unknown man" ever worked for the CIA. He might be the member of any other intelligence service or perhaps that person worked for some "security company" what hires mercenary soldiers for dirty jobs in Africa or Asia. And nothing will connect those persons to any western intelligence organizations because their payments were paid by some South African companies.


But these are only rumors, and nothing ever can be proven about those actions. Even a radical Islamist can say that he is from CIA, and that might be key to those crimes. I think about the scenario, where some Islamist extorting people, claiming that they are from CIA or the Mossad, to motivate the persons to hate western world and Israel.


But the legend remains as we have seen many times before. When we are talking about those strange persons who kill people for political reasons, we must remember the phrase, what is in many detective stories "who benefits the crime"?. That is a key question when officials investigate any crime. And the second question is, who can motivate persons to those horrible actions against innocent people? The motive is a key to answer, who was behind that kind of action, what is a shame to every person in the world.