Skip to main content

Is AI safe?





That is a good question. We can same way ask: is your car safe? The thing that makes AI safe or not is the purpose or ability to make things. If the AI runs on computers. That not connected to the internet, that thing cannot make anything wrong. But the thing is that the physical robot makes the AI dangerous. 

Above this text, we can see robots reading the novel. The AI can use a robot body to collect information from places to that it would not otherwise have access. The robot can read the book for the AI. And then, that data will send to central memory by using WLAN. 

The thing is that we might underestimate the abilities of man-shaped robots. Those robots can turn all jet fighters into robot drones. The man-shaped robot pilot can use the same interfaces as humans. So robot pilots can fly even the most primitive aircraft.

But we don't usually remember that a man-shaped robot is not the same thing as a human. Man-shaped robots are tools that are more complicated than we even thought. They learn very fast because the robot needs only a new program for learning new skills. So operators can transform any robot from a jet pilot to a building worker or fireman in seconds. 

The AI is not afraid, it would not stress, and it would not have feelings. That thing makes AI the perfect thing in many things. When people are calculating how many errors the AI makes. The problem is that AI is not compiled with humans. 


People see from statistics only things that they want to see. When AI will accidentally makes a driving error causing death. It is a  big thing in the news. When ten drunk drivers are killing ten people, nobody mentioned those things in the news. 

When Serbian air defense shot down one F-117 stealth fighter. That was the biggest news in the world. When that plane type made 2000 successful missions, that thing ever mentioned. 

When one Bayraktar drone destroys hundreds of vehicles in Ukraine, that means nothing. But when Russians shot down one Bayraktar over Ukraine. That thing caused lots of news. Shooting down that thing was the biggest failure in the history of drones. And that thing made them useless if we believe in articles, that are published. 

Same way, when the AI searches thieves from the streets. By combining data. That is taken from the CCTV of the shops and streets that thing causes criticism because most of the recognized thieves were black. There was no information did those people carry stolen property. Or did they have some kind of arrest warrant for some other crimes? 


When people say that robots are taking their jobs, we must ask what kind of jobs robots are taking. Of course, AI is a competitor for humans. In job applications, the human must confess to the companies that they are better than the AI. But in job applications, the applicant must confess to the company being the best choice. 

We believe that AI is our worst competitor. But we are wrong. The worst competitors in the business world are other humans. The competition in working life is so tough that sometimes applicants are harming even other humans to get the job that they need. 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

MIT's tractor beam can make the new types of SASER systems possible

   "This chip-based "tractor-beam," which uses an intensely focused beam of light to capture and manipulate biological particles without damaging the cells, could help biologists study the mechanisms of diseases."(Interesting Engineering, MIT’s Star Wars-inspired ‘tractor beam’ uses light to capture, manipulate cells) MIT's tractor beam can make the new types of SASER systems possible. The tractor beam just hovers the nanoparticle in air or medium, and then the laser or some other electromagnetic system transports oscillation into those particles. The ability to make cells and other particles hover in the system makes it possible to create particles whose energy level or resonance frequencies are accurately calculated things.  That thing makes it possible to create things that transmit wave movement accurately and cleanly. This is one version of the use of a tractor beam. Modern tractor beams are like acoustic tweezers where sound waves lock the object in its cr

The new observations tell that the thunderstorms form gamma-rays. That could make gamma-ray lasers possible.

  "An illustration of NASA’s research plane ER-2 flying over thunderstorms. Credit: University of Bergen / Mount Visual (CC BY 4.0), edited" (ScitechDaily, Surprising Discovery: NASA’s Retrofitted U2 Spy Plane Reveals Tropical Lightning Storms Are Radioactive) The new observations tell that the thunderstorms form gamma-rays. That could make gamma-ray lasers possible. The process has been observed by the NASA (Lockheed) ER-2 research plane, which is a modified U-2 spy plane. The gamma-ray formation in thunderstorms. Where lightning and electric fields release electrons that impact the air molecules and water droplets is an interesting thing. That thing opens the route to solving many mysteries.  "The general physics behind how thunderstorms create high-energy flashes of gamma radiation is not a mystery. As thunderstorms develop, swirling drafts drive water droplets, hail, and ice into a mixture that creates an electric charge much like rubbing a balloon on your shirt. Pos

Chinese innovations and space lasers are interesting combinations.

Above: "Tiangong is China's operational space station located in low Earth orbit. (Image credit: Alejomiranda via Getty Images)" (Scpace.com, China's space station, Tiangong: A complete guide) Chinese are close to making nuclear-powered spacecraft.  Almost every day, we can read about Chinese technical advances. So are, the Chinese more innovative than Western people? Or is there some kind of difference in culture and morale between Western and Chinese societies? The Chinese superiority in hypersonic technology is one of the things that tells something about the Chinese way of making things.  In China, the mission means. And the only thing that means is mission. That means that things like budgets and safety orders are far different from Western standards. If some project serves the Chinese communist party and PLA (People's Liberation Army) that guarantees unlimited resources for those projects. Chinese authorities must not care about the public opinion.  If we th