Skip to main content

Is AI some new bubble in the ICT business?





Media is always full of cases where that AI fails. And in many cases, people expect too much from those tools. AI is not intelligent. It doesn't make new solutions. When the AI sees a program, it selects from the event handlers the solution. 

That meant for that of case. Every single case where AI needs to react requires its unique event handler. And the event handler requires a description of the case. 

The event handler is the bite of code that determines how the system must react to cases that the system face. If there is no event handler for some cases, that means the system cannot react to that case. 

The biggest problem is that every possible case requires its event handler. if the robot must operate independently on the streets. It requires a large number of event handlers. 

Driving a car is easier to AI than just walking. Because in traffic are strict regulations for the actions. That means programmers must not create so many event handlers for the car. But that kinds of systems are at prototype levels. 

When AI discusses with people it just asks search engines about the things mentioned in the discussions. Then it connects texts from a certain number of home pages. The accuracy of what the AI uses determines what kinds of answers the AI gives. 

Older social AI selected answers from databases made for it. And if the user asks the wrong question the AI says: "Sorry I don't know the answer". Or it asks the user to tell the answer to the AI. In that model, the user teaches the software or makes a new record for the AI. 

The future is always hard to predict. Trends are changing in the ICT business very often. And the big headlines about AI cause situations in that many corporations invest in that technology. Things like ChatGPT and the Microsoft Bing-cooperative AI are interesting. And social AI brings publicity along with new users for the Bing search engine, and those social AIs are effective tools for marketing. 

AI-based software can do many things. They are excellent tools for many things like making automatized programming using AI is the hottest thing in ICT. And if companies don't follow trends and turn boring they will die. That's why trends have a special meaning in the ICT business. And it's a virtual world where people make business by selling code. 

In the ICT business like in all other business sectors companies need new products all the time, that they can offer to customers and leads. The AI is not yet ready. It's a product that requires lots of work. But that is the purpose of the R&D work. The ChatGPT and its colleagues are nothing more than algorithms and databases. That is offering information for next-generation AI. But does AI mean the next bubble in the ICT business? 

In the past things like virtual game worlds and virtual meeting rooms were hot things in the ICT. Virtual reality and especially net-based virtual reality is also rising. The hybrid conference rooms where a person walks in a game-type environment and goes to a room, where colleagues are introduced as screens on virtual walls are reality. 

The reason, why mobile multimedia tools, like Microsoft HoloLens, are not as successful as they should be is that if a person uses those VR glasses while jogging that could cause falls. But otherwise, those HoloLens can connect to an infrared camera, or drones like quadcopters can transmit their images to those screens. 

Those systems can also connect with satellites, and people can share their action camera images by using mobile telephone-based applications. But civilians have very little use for that kind of tool. Repairment workers could use those things if they connected with wrist cameras. And that helps them to see things that are behind some corners. 

But there are always new trends in ICT. Then those things became old -fashion. Well, all new tools and applications require lots of data. They require the ability to handle very large data masses. The faster internet and more powerful computer technology mean that the systems can handle more and more complicated code. And that allows the creation of new and more powerful AI-based systems. 

But then somebody says that AI is the risk. In the same way, we can find risks anywhere. The biggest security risk is other people. So the AI itself is not at risk. The thing that makes risks are people who allow AI to make things that are risking people. 

If the AI software is not completed, and it drives the car, that causes a very big risk to the environment. Also, if humans give weapons to the AI it turns dangerous.  The situation is similar like we would give a gun to some child. The thing is that AI is not intelligent. It does only things that programmers made to it. This is the thing in the AI and development work. 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

MIT's tractor beam can make the new types of SASER systems possible

   "This chip-based "tractor-beam," which uses an intensely focused beam of light to capture and manipulate biological particles without damaging the cells, could help biologists study the mechanisms of diseases."(Interesting Engineering, MIT’s Star Wars-inspired ‘tractor beam’ uses light to capture, manipulate cells) MIT's tractor beam can make the new types of SASER systems possible. The tractor beam just hovers the nanoparticle in air or medium, and then the laser or some other electromagnetic system transports oscillation into those particles. The ability to make cells and other particles hover in the system makes it possible to create particles whose energy level or resonance frequencies are accurately calculated things.  That thing makes it possible to create things that transmit wave movement accurately and cleanly. This is one version of the use of a tractor beam. Modern tractor beams are like acoustic tweezers where sound waves lock the object in its cr

The new observations tell that the thunderstorms form gamma-rays. That could make gamma-ray lasers possible.

  "An illustration of NASA’s research plane ER-2 flying over thunderstorms. Credit: University of Bergen / Mount Visual (CC BY 4.0), edited" (ScitechDaily, Surprising Discovery: NASA’s Retrofitted U2 Spy Plane Reveals Tropical Lightning Storms Are Radioactive) The new observations tell that the thunderstorms form gamma-rays. That could make gamma-ray lasers possible. The process has been observed by the NASA (Lockheed) ER-2 research plane, which is a modified U-2 spy plane. The gamma-ray formation in thunderstorms. Where lightning and electric fields release electrons that impact the air molecules and water droplets is an interesting thing. That thing opens the route to solving many mysteries.  "The general physics behind how thunderstorms create high-energy flashes of gamma radiation is not a mystery. As thunderstorms develop, swirling drafts drive water droplets, hail, and ice into a mixture that creates an electric charge much like rubbing a balloon on your shirt. Pos

Chinese innovations and space lasers are interesting combinations.

Above: "Tiangong is China's operational space station located in low Earth orbit. (Image credit: Alejomiranda via Getty Images)" (Scpace.com, China's space station, Tiangong: A complete guide) Chinese are close to making nuclear-powered spacecraft.  Almost every day, we can read about Chinese technical advances. So are, the Chinese more innovative than Western people? Or is there some kind of difference in culture and morale between Western and Chinese societies? The Chinese superiority in hypersonic technology is one of the things that tells something about the Chinese way of making things.  In China, the mission means. And the only thing that means is mission. That means that things like budgets and safety orders are far different from Western standards. If some project serves the Chinese communist party and PLA (People's Liberation Army) that guarantees unlimited resources for those projects. Chinese authorities must not care about the public opinion.  If we th